<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Type Declaration Compromise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osteele.com/archives/2004/12/type-declaration-compromise/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osteele.com/archives/2004/12/type-declaration-compromise</link>
	<description>Languages of the real and artificial.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:20:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meteorite for sale </title>
		<link>http://osteele.com/archives/2004/12/type-declaration-compromise/comment-page-1#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Meteorite for sale </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osteele.com/2004/12/31/the-type-declaration-compromise#comment-148</guid>
		<description>Java sucks. It&#039;s API&#039;s are bloated, it forces﻿ you to use OOP even if you don&#039;t feel it is the right paradigm for a task, and it is not dynamic. I prefer dynamic languages with some meta abilities. I think Java Applets wouldn&#039;t be so long in loading if they were dynamic and panel/screen-centric instead of class-centric.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Java sucks. It&#8217;s API&#8217;s are bloated, it forces&iuml;&raquo;&iquest; you to use OOP even if you don&#8217;t feel it is the right paradigm for a task, and it is not dynamic. I prefer dynamic languages with some meta abilities. I think Java Applets wouldn&#8217;t be so long in loading if they were dynamic and panel/screen-centric instead of class-centric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laptop Backpacks</title>
		<link>http://osteele.com/archives/2004/12/type-declaration-compromise/comment-page-1#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Laptop Backpacks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osteele.com/2004/12/31/the-type-declaration-compromise#comment-147</guid>
		<description>You are right on most of the points written and agree with most of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right on most of the points written and agree with most of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Languages of the real and artificial · Three Lefts Make a Ri</title>
		<link>http://osteele.com/archives/2004/12/type-declaration-compromise/comment-page-1#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Languages of the real and artificial · Three Lefts Make a Ri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 19:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osteele.com/2004/12/31/the-type-declaration-compromise#comment-146</guid>
		<description>[...] Feed     &#171; The Type Declaration Compromise  Laszlo&#8217;s Boston Office &#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Feed     &laquo; The Type Declaration Compromise  Laszlo&#8217;s Boston Office &raquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DenkZEIT » Blog Archive » Developing large scale application</title>
		<link>http://osteele.com/archives/2004/12/type-declaration-compromise/comment-page-1#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>DenkZEIT » Blog Archive » Developing large scale application</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osteele.com/2004/12/31/the-type-declaration-compromise#comment-145</guid>
		<description>[...] Just for completeness I will briefly mention other features of type information that can be realized in DynamicLanguages by other means (not type). The list was taken from OliverSteele&#8217;s article The Type Declaration Compromise: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just for completeness I will briefly mention other features of type information that can be realized in DynamicLanguages by other means (not type). The list was taken from OliverSteele&#8217;s article The Type Declaration Compromise: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dare Obasanjo's WebLog</title>
		<link>http://osteele.com/archives/2004/12/type-declaration-compromise/comment-page-1#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Dare Obasanjo's WebLog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2005 08:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osteele.com/2004/12/31/the-type-declaration-compromise#comment-144</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A New Generation of Features for Programming Languages&lt;/strong&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A New Generation of Features for Programming Languages</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dare Obasanjo's WebLog</title>
		<link>http://osteele.com/archives/2004/12/type-declaration-compromise/comment-page-1#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Dare Obasanjo's WebLog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2005 20:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osteele.com/2004/12/31/the-type-declaration-compromise#comment-143</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A New Generation of Features for Programming Languages&lt;/strong&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A New Generation of Features for Programming Languages</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dare Obasanjo's WebLog</title>
		<link>http://osteele.com/archives/2004/12/type-declaration-compromise/comment-page-1#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Dare Obasanjo's WebLog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2005 13:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osteele.com/2004/12/31/the-type-declaration-compromise#comment-142</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A New Generation of Features for Programming Languages&lt;/strong&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A New Generation of Features for Programming Languages</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dare Obasanjo's WebLog</title>
		<link>http://osteele.com/archives/2004/12/type-declaration-compromise/comment-page-1#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Dare Obasanjo's WebLog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2005 06:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osteele.com/2004/12/31/the-type-declaration-compromise#comment-141</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A New Generation of Features for Programming Languages&lt;/strong&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A New Generation of Features for Programming Languages</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dreamer</title>
		<link>http://osteele.com/archives/2004/12/type-declaration-compromise/comment-page-1#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dreamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osteele.com/2004/12/31/the-type-declaration-compromise#comment-140</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Guido on static typing in Python&lt;/strong&gt;
I was just reading the latest brain dump by Guido on &#039;Optional Static Typing in Python&#039; and various comments on it.

First impression? I don&#039;t like it. The simple reason being that it makes Python much more complex. I know its the same rant again ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Guido on static typing in Python</strong><br />
I was just reading the latest brain dump by Guido on &#8216;Optional Static Typing in Python&#8217; and various comments on it.</p>
<p>First impression? I don&#8217;t like it. The simple reason being that it makes Python much more complex. I know its the same rant again &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Three Lefts Make a Right: The Type Declaration Paradox</title>
		<link>http://osteele.com/archives/2004/12/type-declaration-compromise/comment-page-1#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Three Lefts Make a Right: The Type Declaration Paradox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 11:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osteele.com/2004/12/31/the-type-declaration-compromise#comment-139</guid>
		<description>[...] Right: The Type Declaration Paradox   1/3/2005 in  	Software               A few days ago &lt;a href=&quot;http://osteele.com/archives/2004/12/type-declaration-compromise&quot;&gt;I argued&lt;/a&gt; that even though type declarations aren&#8217;t the best possible soluti [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Right: The Type Declaration Paradox   1/3/2005 in  	Software               A few days ago <a href="http://osteele.com/archives/2004/12/type-declaration-compromise">I argued</a> that even though type declarations aren&#8217;t the best possible soluti [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

